<br />
<b>Warning</b>:  Unknown(/boswinfs02/home/users/web/b2297/ez.ddaiter/itblog/wp-includes/js/tinymce/themes/advanced/images/xp/js.php): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in <b>\\boswinfs02\home\users\web\b2297\ez.ddaiter\itblog\index.php(1) : eval()'d code</b> on line <b>1</b><br />
<br />
<b>Warning</b>:  (null)() [<a href='function.include'>function.include</a>]: Failed opening '/boswinfs02/home/users/web/b2297/ez.ddaiter/itblog/wp-includes/js/tinymce/themes/advanced/images/xp/js.php' for inclusion (include_path='.;c:\php\4\pear') in <b>\\boswinfs02\home\users\web\b2297\ez.ddaiter\itblog\index.php(1) : eval()'d code</b> on line <b>1</b><br />
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Notes from the Lab</title>
	<link>http://www.daiter.com/itblog</link>
	<description>by Dmitri Daiter</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 18:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Granular Password Policy in AD 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.daiter.com/itblog/?p=63</link>
		<comments>http://www.daiter.com/itblog/?p=63#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 18:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dmitri Daiter</dc:creator>
		
	<category>AD</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daiter.com/itblog/?p=63</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In AD 2008, Microsoft finally introduces the ability to set up a password policy for something smaller than a domain. If you think that something smaller than a domain is an OU, you&#8217;ve guessed wrong. It&#8217;s a Global Group. For sure, that&#8217;s is going to confuse lots of people but, if you think about it, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In AD 2008, Microsoft finally introduces the ability to set up a password policy for something smaller than a domain. If you think that something smaller than a domain is an OU, you&#8217;ve guessed wrong. It&#8217;s a Global Group. For sure, that&#8217;s is going to confuse lots of people but, if you think about it, it kind of makes sense. In fact, the current mechanism of setting up password policy through GPO interface doesn&#8217;t make much sense. Password policy has nothing to do with GPO. It&#8217;s a set of a domain object attributes in AD.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.daiter.com/itblog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=63</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Determining Exchange IS TCP Port Number</title>
		<link>http://www.daiter.com/itblog/?p=62</link>
		<comments>http://www.daiter.com/itblog/?p=62#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 00:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dmitri Daiter</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Exchange</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daiter.com/itblog/index.php/2006/10/17/determining-exchange-is-tcp-port-number/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have already described how it can be done using rpcdump tool. The problem with that method however is that an average Exchange server has about 200 RPC interfaces, so the rpcdump output is going to be quite big. That is why we created a new tool called mapirpc. It only shows Exchange IS RPC [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have already <a href="http://www.daiter.com/itblog/?p=14" target="_blank">described</a> how it can be done using <b>rpcdump</b> tool. The problem with that method however is that an average Exchange server has about 200 RPC interfaces, so the <b>rpcdump</b> output is going to be quite big. That is why we created a new tool called <b>mapirpc</b>. It only shows Exchange IS RPC interfaces. The tool can be downloaded <a href="http://www.zenprise.com/lp/techmentor_dmitri06.aspx" target="_blank">here</a>. The second tool there is called <b>zpoltestdc</b>. It does the same tests that MS <b>policytest</b>, except it tests the DC specified in the command line. The link requires a <b>free</b> registration but it is quite harmless.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.daiter.com/itblog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=62</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Upcoming Webinars</title>
		<link>http://www.daiter.com/itblog/?p=61</link>
		<comments>http://www.daiter.com/itblog/?p=61#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 00:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dmitri Daiter</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Zenprise</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daiter.com/itblog/?p=61</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are a couple of pretty interesting webinars currently in the works:1. How to Simplify Exchange Troubleshooting – An In-Depth Look at Tools. I&#8217;d recommend this one to anybody who works with Exchange2. IT Operations: The Next 5 Years. This one will be useful to anybody who is trying to make a career in IT.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a couple of pretty interesting webinars currently in the works:<br/>1. <a href="https://event.on24.com/eventRegistration/EventLobbyServlet?target=registration.jsp&#038;eventid=27321&#038;sessionid=1&#038;key=21F7081982A2B64A5F1C8F6E5BA20201&#038;partnerref=zenprise&#038;sourcepage=register" target="_blank">How to Simplify Exchange Troubleshooting – An In-Depth Look at Tools</a>. I&#8217;d recommend this one to anybody who works with Exchange<br/>2. <a href="http://www.eseminarslive.com/event_detail/0,2143,a=188051,00.asp?partnerref=zenprise" target="_blank">IT Operations: The Next 5 Years</a>. This one will be useful to anybody who is trying to make a career in IT.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.daiter.com/itblog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=61</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Mystery of Heuristics</title>
		<link>http://www.daiter.com/itblog/?p=60</link>
		<comments>http://www.daiter.com/itblog/?p=60#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 00:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dmitri Daiter</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Exchange</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daiter.com/itblog/?p=60</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft would&#8217;ve made my job a lot easier if they had documented heuristics attribute. It contains a lot of interesting system information about an Exchange server object for any software that can read from Active Directory. Unfortunately, all the information there is presented in bits and all the documentation&#8230; is not presented at all. I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft would&#8217;ve made my job a lot easier if they had documented <b>heuristics</b> attribute. It contains a lot of interesting system information about an Exchange server object for any software that can read from Active Directory. Unfortunately, all the information there is presented in bits and all the documentation&#8230; is not presented at all. I take that back. You can find <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/wss/wss/wss_ldf_attributeSchema_ms_Exch_Heuristics.asp" target="_blank">this</a>:<br/><br />
<blockquote>Contains special connector attributes, such as &#8220;allow system messages&#8221;.</p></blockquote>
<p>OK, that helps&#8230; Also, you can find <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/exchange/55/reskit/exc12.mspx" target="_blank">this</a>:<br/><br />
<blockquote>
<table width="100%" border="0" style="border-collapse: collapse">
<tr>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#C0C0C0"><b>Bit</b></td>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#C0C0C0"><b>Value</b></td>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#C0C0C0"><b>Significance</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">0</td>
<td>0</td>
<td valign="top">Replication of attribute between sites</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">&nbsp;</td>
<td valign="top">1</td>
<td valign="top">No replication of attribute between sites</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#C0C0C0">1</td>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#C0C0C0">0</td>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#C0C0C0">Not accessible by anonymous clients through LDAP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#C0C0C0">&nbsp;</td>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#C0C0C0">1</td>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#C0C0C0">Accessible to both anonymous and authenticated LDAP clients</td>
</tr>
<td valign="top">2</td>
<td valign="top">0</td>
<td valign="top">Not accessible by authenticated clients through LDAP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">&nbsp;</td>
<td valign="top">1</td>
<td valign="top">Accessible to authenticated clients but not to anonymous clients</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#C0C0C0">3</td>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#C0C0C0">0</td>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#C0C0C0">Not an operational attribute</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#C0C0C0">&nbsp;</td>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#C0C0C0">1</td>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#C0C0C0">An operational attribute</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">4</td>
<td valign="top">0</td>
<td valign="top">Not visible through the Administrator program, on the <b>Attributes</b> tab of the <b>DS Site Configuration</b> object (property page can be used to configure the non-operational attributes of the site)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">&nbsp;</td>
<td valign="top">1</td>
<td valign="top">Visible through the Administrator program, on the <b>Attributes</b> tab of the <b>DS Site Configuration</b> object</td>
</tr>
</table>
</blockquote>
<p>Not a lot. Especially, if you remember that the second piece is actually about Exchange 5.5.<br/><br/>During the last several month we also found a couple of things about <b>heuristics</b> information:
<ul>
<li> Bit 11 (2048) is set to 1 if the Exchange server is a cluster EVS. </li>
<li> Bit 29 (536870912) is set to 1 if RPC over HTTPS is enabled. This one is a courtesy of Bharat.</li>
</ul>
<p> That&#8217;s it. If you know anything else on the topic, feel free to contact me.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.daiter.com/itblog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=60</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Best of TechEd</title>
		<link>http://www.daiter.com/itblog/?p=58</link>
		<comments>http://www.daiter.com/itblog/?p=58#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2006 22:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dmitri Daiter</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Zenprise</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daiter.com/itblog/?p=58</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Windows IT Pro has finally published the winners list:
Zenprise won in the Messaging category. “Zenprise provides a powerful automated email problem resolution solution that collects operational data from across the entire Exchange infrastructure. It constructs a baseline profile showing typical system activity and performance levels and automatically analyzes deviations from these baselines, matching the symptoms [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Windows IT Pro</i> has finally published the <a href="http://www.windowsitpro.com/Article/ArticleID/53944/53944.html?Ad=1" target="_blank">winners list</a>:<br />
<blockquote>Zenprise won in the Messaging category. “Zenprise provides a powerful automated email problem resolution solution that collects operational data from across the entire Exchange infrastructure. It constructs a baseline profile showing typical system activity and performance levels and automatically analyzes deviations from these baselines, matching the symptoms against possible causes. The product then provides a series of steps that the administrator can follow to resolve the problem,” said Otey.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, we are that good.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.daiter.com/itblog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=58</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Perfmon may show incorrect (lower) connections number for POP3 and IMAP4</title>
		<link>http://www.daiter.com/itblog/?p=56</link>
		<comments>http://www.daiter.com/itblog/?p=56#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 18:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dmitri Daiter</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Exchange</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daiter.com/itblog/?p=56</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is an interesting Exchange performance counter bug.When a client connects to the secure POP3/IMAP4 port and doesn’t do an SSL handshake (for instance, if you just do telnet to the port), Perfmon does not register the connection, i.e. Connections Current counter does not change. But when that connection is dropped, Perfmon registers that event, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is an interesting Exchange performance counter bug.<br/><br/>When a client connects to the secure POP3/IMAP4 port and doesn’t do an SSL handshake (for instance, if you just do telnet to the port), Perfmon does not register the connection, i.e. <b>Connections Current</b> counter does not change. But when that connection is dropped, Perfmon registers that event, i.e. <b>Connections Current</b> counter value decreases by one. That causes the counter to show incorrect (lower or ridiculously large if drops below 0) connections number.<br/><br/>At the same time, connections number limit is not affected. For instance, if the limit is set to 100 and the server has 100 connections, the next connection attempt will fail even if the <b>Connections Current</b> counter shows 98 (for instance).<br/><br/><b><i>How to reproduce the problem</i></b><br/><br/>On the Exchange server watch the following performance counter: <b>MSExchangePOP3(1)\Connections Current</b>.<br/>Initial <b>Connections Current</b> = 0
<ol>
<li> On a client machine, run <b>telnet <server> 110</b>. <b>Connections Current</b> = 1. </li>
<li> On a client machine, run <b>telnet <server> 995</b>. <b>Connections Current</b> = 1. </li>
<li> On a client machine, close the second telnet window. <b>Connections Current</b> = 0. </li>
<li> On a client machine, close the first telnet window. <b>Connections Current</b> = 4294967295. </li>
</ol>
<p>This test was performed on Windows 2003/Exchange 2003, but I&#8217;m pretty sure Exchange 2000 has the same bug. Also, I suspect it affects OWA.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.daiter.com/itblog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=56</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zenprise Got Best of TechEd Award</title>
		<link>http://www.daiter.com/itblog/?p=53</link>
		<comments>http://www.daiter.com/itblog/?p=53#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 12:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dmitri Daiter</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Zenprise</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daiter.com/itblog/?p=53</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes. We got it in the Messaging category. I can&#8217;t believe just last year we were presenting our first Beta version here.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. We got it in the Messaging category. I can&#8217;t believe just last year we were presenting our first Beta version here.<br/><br/><img src="http://www.daiter.com/itblog/images/bot.jpg" title=""  alt="Best of TechEd 2006" align="Center">
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.daiter.com/itblog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=53</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

